The Grey, on
the face of it, doesn’t have great pedigree. Director Joe Carnahan’s most
recent film was 2010’s critical punchbag The
A-Team. Liam Neeson’s career trajectory – a fascinating thing in its own
right – has seen him mired as an archetypal grizzled action man in such
shoot-first-think-later fluff as Taken
and Unknown. Re-watching Schindler’s List these days you half
expect him to punch his way into the Reichstag to lay der smack down on Adolf himself. And the subject matter –
essentially a plane-crash survival movie – promises little beyond the utterly
generic.
But let’s not be hasty. Pigeonholing directors as hacks
is a recent phenomenon (Such immortals as Ford, Hawks and Hitchcock made a few
duds in their sophomore days). Neeson-wise, there’s nothing wrong with grizzled
per se – for example, his small role is probably the best thing in Scorsese’s Gangs of New York – and he has never
been more gruff and stony than in The
Grey. And while the film is definitely a genre piece – you might even call
it a B-movie – we know these days that the constraints of genre can quite
poetically portray deeper truths than what we call ‘the art film’. Certainly
Spielberg can tell you more about childhood and loss than, say, Almodovar.
The story, then: Neeson is John Ottway, a middle-aged,
morose deadbeat marooned in an oil station in the frigid Alaskan wilds. His job
is to snipe off wolves and other maleficent critters, protecting his roustabout
misfit colleagues as they go about their drilling and cussing. On a routine
flight back to civilization (or, at least, Fairbanks), Ottway’s plane is beset
by terrible weather and crashes. Ottway and six others somehow survive the
crash, only to be faced down by a pack of malignant wolves; the group begin a
trudge southward in a hopeless quest for safety, with little more than wits and
sticks for protection.
So you and your mind's eye can probably take it from there. But this is an entirely superior treatment of ‘survival thriller’. From a
merely technical point of view, it is beautifully executed. The crash itself is
a veritable Saving-Private-Ryan-Omaha-Beach
of a plane crash. The performances too: Neeson is stellar, but the supporting
cast are entirely excellent. Carnahan’s directorial flourishes also take this
above the usual multiplex fare. His dream sequences evoke those feverish
reality-bending dreams you have after catching influenza, and his refusal to
turn Alaska into picture postcard is also a bold choice.
But what of these ‘deeper truths’ that I’m rambling on
about? Well, the key theme that I took away was that of faith versus natural
law, which is another way of saying – what is it to be human? Ottway has
rejected his faith, but would love to believe (his own eloi, eloi, lama sabacthani? moment is a highlight – Neeson
reminding us that he really can act) and
it is fascinating to see his growing comprehension of the nature’s magnificent
indifference to the plight of the survivors. They haven’t been saved ‘for some
reason’; they simply happened not to die when the plane crashed. A bleak,
fatalistic outlook maybe, but truthful – and courageous. Anyone inclined to Buddhist
teachings would do well to see The Grey.
There are occasional mis-steps: the parallels between
animal and human social order are sometimes a little over-egged. Also there is
an entirely pointless and deflating
post-credits scene that I urge you to avoid (I can’t bloody stand – or even
understand – this craze for post-credits scenes). Finally it’s worth noting
that the films has been somewhat mendaciously pitched as a gung-ho action
flick, which it is not – while it might help pack ‘em in, it will also lead to
the film missing its real audience: lovers of great American cinema.
********8/10

Liam was good in Ricky Gervais' recent comedy, Life's too short. I like him. He's a giant of a man but oozes warmth and friendliness.
ReplyDeleteGreetings from London.
Thank you! Likewise from Manchester.
ReplyDeleteI though he was pretty much the funniest thing in Life's Too Short; great to see him send himself up.
Thoroughly echo your sentiments on this one. Didn't realise there was a post-credits scene though, very curious now.
ReplyDeleteThe post-credits scene at least appears to suggest a resolution to the final conflict - but not conclusively (so what's the point, when you already have an ambiguous ending?!).
ReplyDelete